A stunning report just connected Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, to evidence of improper election manipulation.
According Breitbart News, “the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society at a press conference on Wednesday alleged Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife made $419.5 million in contributions to non-profit organizations during the 2020 election cycle–$350 million to the ‘Safe Elections’ Project of the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) and another $69.5 million to the Center for Election Innovation and Research–that, ‘improperly influence[d] the 2020 presidential election on behalf of one particular candidate and party.'”
Zuckerberg claimed in 2016 that Facebook did not desire to be the arbiter of truth, yet the social media giant has spent the better part of the last 4 years removing and throttling news it admits it did not care for.
According to the Amistad Project, Zuckerberg’s contributions played a part in the groups forming “two-tier election system favoring one demographic while disadvantaging another demographic” in three ways:
-Private monies dictated city and county election management contrary to both federal law and state election plans endorsed and developed by state legislatures with authority granted by the United States Constitution.
-Executive officials in swing states facilitated, through unique and novel contracts, the sharing of private and sensitive information about citizens within those states with private interests, some whom actively promote leftist candidates and agendas.
-Swing state governors also started issuing emergency executive orders shutting down in-person voting while pouring new state resources into encouraging persons to vote in advance. Polling data revealed this coordinated assault on in-person voting generally favored Democrat Party voters who preferred to vote in advance, while placing Republicans, who preferred to vote in person, at a disadvantage. These actions represent the beginning of the formation of a two-tier election system favoring one demographic while disadvantaging another demographic.
To read more about this report, click here.